Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
> Your AllInterlocks record has SCAN set to "I/O Intr" so forward-linking > to it with a database link will not cause it to process. If you want it > to process on both I/O Interrupt and from the forward link, you will > have to make the forward-link a CA link, so Mark's suggestion above was > almost right. Try this instead:
In the meantime, I am trying to wrap my head around a I/O Intr record whose processing is also triggered by a FLNK. Although it can be programmed, in practical terms it doesn't make sense to me. -- E
|
- References:
- ai records: pool (SCAN) VS pull (FLNK) VS push (some examples) Benoit
- RE: ai records: pool (SCAN) VS pull (FLNK) VS push (some examples) Mark Rivers
- Re: ai records: pool (SCAN) VS pull (FLNK) VS push (some examples) Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: ai records: pool (SCAN) VS pull (FLNK) VS push (some examples) Andrew Johnson
- Next:
pilatus detecotr modify FileName problem 洪春霞
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: ai records: pool (SCAN) VS pull (FLNK) VS push (some examples) Andrew Johnson
- Next:
pilatus detecotr modify FileName problem 洪春霞
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
<2013>
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
|
|
ANJ, 20 Apr 2015 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Talk
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|