Hi Ben;
Thanks a lot for your advice,
I'm now constructing a brand new local test environment for EPICS-
related
software from scratch.
So, I'll try version 2.2 first and if something goes wrong, I'll get
back
to 2.1. Thanks again.
Best regards,
J.Odagiri
----- Original Message -----
> Thanks for jumping in, Ralph.
>
> To slightly elaborate: By default pick latest release in version 2.2,
> see Ralph's link. If you need to support lots of old programs, version
> 2.1 might give you slightly less trouble.
>
> Cheers
> Ben
>
> On 03/11/2016 10:11 AM, Ralph Lange wrote:
> > http://www-csr.bessy.de/control/SoftDist/sequencer/Installation.html#prerequisites
> >
> >
> > Cheers,
> > ~Ralph
> >
> >
> > On 11/03/2016 09:44, [email protected] wrote:
> >> Hi all;
> >>
> >> I'm searching for appropriate version of sequencer.
> >>
> >> The version of base we chose to use is R.14.12.3.
> >>
> >> Which version of sequencer do you recommend to use
> >> with that version of base?
> >>
> >> Thanks a lot in advance.
> >>
> >> J.Odagiri (KEK)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> "Make it so they have to reboot after every typo." ― Scott Adams
>
>
- References:
- appropriate version of sequnecer jun-ichi.odagiri
- Re: appropriate version of sequnecer Ralph Lange
- Re: appropriate version of sequnecer Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: Scan problem when the ioc behave as client Mark Rivers
- Next:
Re: IoC support for Rohde & Schwarz SMA100A Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: appropriate version of sequnecer Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Show alarms, events and measurements from DSP in CS-Studio and generate files with this data Carlos Gómez Martinez
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|