Hi Matt,
> I came across the same issue last year, and there is some reasoning
> in this post:
> http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2015/msg01502.php
Thanks a lot, that answers my question :-) I'm using a calc record now
which uses a floating point input field.
Cheers,
Martin
--
Martin Konrad
Control System Engineer
Facility for Rare Isotope Beams
Michigan State University
640 South Shaw Lane
East Lansing, MI 48824-1321, USA
Tel. 517-908-7253
Email: [email protected]
- Replies:
- RE: conversion with ai and devAsynFloat64 Mark Rivers
- References:
- conversion with ai and devAsynFloat64 Konrad, Martin
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: conversion with ai and devAsynFloat64 Pearson, Matthew R.
- Next:
RE: conversion with ai and devAsynFloat64 Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: conversion with ai and devAsynFloat64 Pearson, Matthew R.
- Next:
RE: conversion with ai and devAsynFloat64 Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·