EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use?
From: "J. Lewis Muir" <[email protected]>
To: Pete Jemian <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 10:53:45 -0500
On 08/10, Pete Jemian wrote:
> On 8/10/2016 12:34 AM, Paramveer Jain wrote:
>> I have installed EPICS 3.15 . is it good for beamline?
>
> Sure is

Hi, Pete!

Maybe I missed an announcement, but when did this become the case?

On the EPICS website, it lists the following release series:

  R3.16  Developer releases
  R3.15  Current releases
  R3.14  Stable releases
  R3.13  Frozen, still used in a few places
  R3.12  Older versions, fossilized
  R3.11  Pre-historic

I thought R3.14 was the recommended series for production use.  Has
this changed?  What's the difference between the "current" and "stable"
series?

Thanks!

Lewis

P.S. Playing netiquette police, Pete, you top-posted!  I've corrected it
in this email.  See [1] which is noted in [2].  Maybe no one abides by
this anymore, though, now that replies might come from a mobile device
which might default to top-posting (e.g. Apple's iOS Mail app)?

P.P.S. Playing netiquette police, Paramveer, you didn't provide a
subject in your email.  I've added a subject to this email.  It's nice
to include a subject in emails to the list so that readers can tell what
your email is about.  See [3] which is noted in [2].

[1] http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#toppost
[2] http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/index.php
[3] http://linux.sgms-centre.com/misc/netiquette.php#subject

Replies:
Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? Michael Davidsaver
References:
[no subject] Paramveer Jain
Re: Pete Jemian

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Query Kasemir, Kay
Next: Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? Michael Davidsaver
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Pete Jemian
Next: Re: EPICS 3.15 good for production use? Michael Davidsaver
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  <20162017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2016 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·