Re: Opinion on timing system for synchrotron beamlines

[bob dalesio <bob.dalesio@gmail.com>]

Will the PANDA also be able to generate trigger based on position profiles?

Thanks!

Bob

On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 12:09 PM, <isa.uzun@diamond.ac.uk> wrote:

Dear Marcio,

 

Diamond and SOLEIL are in the process of commissioning first set of PandA Boxes.

 

PandaBox is an upgrade of Zebra targeting beamline applications, especially continuous scanning. It is going to have embedded Micro Research EVR towards mid-2017.

 

http://www.ohwr.org/projects/pandabox/wiki

 

Regards,

Isa

 

From: tech-talk-bounces@aps.anl.gov [mailto:tech-talk-bounces@aps.anl.gov] On Behalf Of Márcio Paduan Donadio
Sent: 10 November 2016 16:47
To: tech-talk@aps.anl.gov
Cc: Márcio Paduan Donadio
Subject: Re: Opinion on timing system for synchrotron beamlines

 

        Hello, Bob.

    We are in the project phase of Sirius' beamlines control system. We did the requirements gathering with the researchers and no one cited the synchronization with the accelerator timing system, with one exception: the pump and probe experiments. So it seemed that it was a special case.

    But some time ago I was evaluating a Zebra Box and asked a friend that works with beamlines in the USA to comment about his impressions on this system. Among some things he told me that Zebra Box lacks from direct connection with the EVG and that is an important feature because he needed to get the global timestamp from it.

    So, I thought that, maybe, we don't know yet that we will need to synchronize events during some other experiments like quick exafs, fly scan mapping, and tomography. That's why I'm talking to you guys, that have more experience on beamline's timing system.

    Thank you very much,

-- 

Márcio Paduan Donadio

Engenheiro de Computação - Software de Operação das Linhas de Luz

Laboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron – (LNLS)

Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM)

+ 55 (19) 3512-3520 - marcio.donadio@lnls.br

www.lnls.cnpem.br

 

Em 09-11-2016 17:52, bob dalesio escreveu:

First a disclaimer: The actual EPICS developers always have a better answer about the technology as is. 

 

That said, I will take a shot at it:

Hi Marcio,

This is really a question that starts at the beam line.

What do they want? Do they care about the energy? at what precision?

 

There are independent timing systems implemented in FPGAs with different specifications. If you cannot buy hardware, working with this firmware allows you to build your own.

 

EPICS time stamps can be derived from different timing sources. If you use PTP, as I understand it, you have to purchase a master as well (is that right?). So, it is important to know what your beam lines want and your cost constraints.

 

EPICS itself in version 3 has time to the nsec. The MRF timing hardware time stamp resolution is 8 nsec. The jitter is < 10 psec. It can easily be extended to the beam lines. Slow signals, like beam energy, can be sent over the timing system along with time stamp information that could be put into the metadata for the experiment. LCLS II timing has sub nsec time derived at the EVR from the EVG (both homemade at SLAC). PVAccess has 64 bits for subsecond instead of 32 bits. It also has a user defined extension for pulse ID or other user defined identifier.

 

- Bob

 

On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:26 PM, Márcio Paduan Donadio <marcio.donadio@lnls.br> wrote:

     I'd like to know your experience regarding integration of the
accelerator timing system with the beamlines:
     - Which accelerator events are useful for the beamlines' control
system.
     - Do the beamlines use a global and very precise timestamp sent
from the accelerator timing system? What is the time precision?
     - Do you think that a PTP system is sufficient for timestamping
experiments in beamlines?
     - What is the EPICS role regarding such a timing system?

     Thank you,

--
Márcio Paduan Donadio
Engenheiro de Computação - Software de Operação das Linhas de Luz
Laboratório Nacional de Luz Síncrotron – (LNLS)
Centro Nacional de Pesquisa em Energia e Materiais (CNPEM)
+ 55 (19) 3512-3520 - marcio.donadio@lnls.br
www.lnls.cnpem.br

 

 

-- 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom