Eric here again. We (my colleague Jen, actually) indeed solved our last problem with ca_put and ca_get in threaded C++. We’re happily connecting and reading/writing from/to our IOC now. Many thanks for the help.
Our next problem is that we now have two identical power supplies on same localhost we need to do this with. We see we’re not the only ones to have come across this issue where starting up the second IOC makes cainfo calls to the first one not work. The channels are uniquely named and the IOCs successfully connect to the HVCAEN and appear to be running. However, cainfo to PVs on the second IOC work and report a 5-digit port number that it’s using, while the first IOC, which had been working fine on 5064 is suddenly disconnected. We tried following the instructions from your link below to change the iptables routing. /var/log/messages doesn’t complain, but nothing from subsequent iptables commands confirms to us that the instruction actually took hold. And the cainfo behavior does not change after IOC restarts. We also tried, per Kay’s instructions somewhere, changing EPICS_CA_ADDR_LIST=”192.168.1.255 5064, 192.168.1.255 5064” from it’s former value of NO, which didn’t help
Do you have a nudge that can get us past this problem?
Thx -- Eric
From: "Mendez, Jennifer M" <Jennifer.Mendez@pnnl.gov>
Date: Friday, December 1, 2017 at 5:25 PM
To: "Church, Eric D" <email@example.com>
Subject: iptables line
arxe:/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d$ sudo /sbin/iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -d $addr -p udp --dport 5064 -j DNAT --to-destination $bcast
arxe:/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d$ echo $addr
arxe:/etc/NetworkManager/dispatcher.d$ echo $bcast
On 11/9/17, 11:59 AM, "Andrew Johnson" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
On 11/08/2017 10:05 AM, Church, Eric D wrote:
> We are trying to use caput() and caget() from a C++ program. The IOC is
> up and I can issue caputs and cagets from the command line and put and
> retrieve reasonable values into our EPICS records. We’re having some
> difficulty in compiled C++, however.
> I include below the apparently necessary gymnastics to successfully
> ca_get() anything in C++. We want to do this with a total of about 48
> PVs once every 15 seconds. The first thing we note is we need to do a
> context_create and create_channel each of those 48 times each 15
> seconds. Which necessitates the channel clear and context destroy at the
> end. We can not use our class member chid over and over with each run
> through this function, it seems.
I want to make sure I understand your requirements first: Is the problem
you describe (that you continually have to create and destroy channels)
because your application is structured such that you don't have a single
long-running process, or because you're having problems coding it to
keep all those channels connected?
For efficiency reasons it is much better to connect everything once and
keep the connection to the IOC(s) open all the time, re-useing the same
chids every time you want to do some more I/O. You do have to make sure
that your client code can cope with the IOC shutting down, rebooting or
not being turned on until some time after the client has been started,
but that is generally just a matter of getting the code right.
Unfortunately our standard CA client code examples only really show the
quick-and-dirty approach of connecting channels, doing some I/O and then
shutting down again almost immediately. When you're writing a long-lived
client though you should generally only use the CA APIs that use
callbacks to notify you when the client library gets messages from the
IOC servers it's connected to. The ca_pend_io() routine is not suitable
for this style of programming, where your code generally consists of
routines that react to events from outside and work out what to do next.
It is legal to call most CA routines from within a callback (the CA
reference manual describes the 2 or 3 routines where that is not
allowed, ca_pend_io() being one of them).
I think I'm going to stop here and wait for your reply to the above
question before I write any more or review the code you posted.
Arguing for surveillance because you have nothing to hide is no
different than making the claim, "I don't care about freedom of
speech because I have nothing to say." -- Edward Snowdon
- Re: caget() from C++ Mark Rivers
- caget() from C++ Church, Eric D
- Re: caget() from C++ Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
EPICS 7 Release Candidate 1 Andrew Johnson
Re: caget() from C++ Mark Rivers
- Navigate by Thread:
Re: caget() from C++ Andrew Johnson
Re: caget() from C++ Mark Rivers