On 02/12, Anton Derbenev wrote:
> Any thoughts on the matter are also welcome.
Hello, Anton!
I think your project is a good, but I think even better would have been
to use pkgsrc <https://www.pkgsrc.org/> instead of Debian packaging.
It's probably too late for you to change, and I don't want to sound
critical, but with Debian packaging, you are only reaching sites and
users who use a Debian-based distribution. (I'm sure there are tools
to convert .deb into whatever, but I doubt many in the EPICS community
are using them, and I don't know how seamless the experience would be.)
You're probably not reaching any site or user who uses CentOS, RHEL,
or any other non-Debian-based Linux distribution. pkgsrc, on the other
hand, is cross-platform, so if you had used it, you could be reaching
Linux, macOS, Windows (via Cygwin), and Solaris right now.
Regards,
Lewis
- Replies:
- Re: NSLS-II Debian Repository in 2018 Michael Davidsaver
- References:
- NSLS-II Debian Repository in 2018 Anton Derbenev
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Other Access Security implementations? Miroslav Pavleski
- Next:
SMA100A Signal Generatordriver Ha, Kiman
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
NSLS-II Debian Repository in 2018 Anton Derbenev
- Next:
Re: NSLS-II Debian Repository in 2018 Michael Davidsaver
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
<2018>
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|