Am 26.04.19 um 15:24 schrieb Laznovsky Michael (PSI) via Tech-talk:
> Sheesh, barely posted and already found a bug. The line:
>
> %% (n > 0)? "," : "",
> should be
> %% (n > 1)? "," : "",
>
> because it's "for 1..N". Although maybe the seq parser would have accepted the extra comma?
I don't think so and certainly wouldn't recommend to rely on it.
Cheers
Ben
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- References:
- [SNL] possibility to cut the argument string. GAGET Alexis via Tech-talk
- RE: [SNL] possibility to cut the argument string. Laznovsky Michael (PSI) via Tech-talk
- RE: [SNL] possibility to cut the argument string. Laznovsky Michael (PSI) via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: [SNL] possibility to cut the argument string. Laznovsky Michael (PSI) via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: GPIB replies lost? Benjamin Franksen via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: [SNL] possibility to cut the argument string. Laznovsky Michael (PSI) via Tech-talk
- Next:
Stopping IOC boot on failure to load database Paduan Donadio, Marcio via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|