Hello!
It seems to me that the terms "EPICS" and "EPICS Base" are often used
interchangeably, yet they're not the same thing. Are the following
definitions correct?
EPICS: A specification of control system definitions and protocols.
EPICS Base: A C/C++ implementation of the EPICS specification.
If correct, then I'm OK with keeping the name EPICS Base, but I wonder
if a better name might be EPICS-C++? Then, if desired, you could
have other implementations of the EPICS specification: EPICS-Java,
EPICS-Perl, EPICS-Python, EPICS-Ruby, etc.
Thoughts?
Lewis
- Replies:
- Re: EPICS vs. EPICS Base Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
EPICS Base labels at epics-controls.org J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: EPICS Base labels and series descriptions at epics.anl.gov Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
EPICS Base labels at epics-controls.org J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: EPICS vs. EPICS Base Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
<2019>
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|