EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Setting an array to zero length
From: "Rogers, Will \(DLSLtd, RAL, LSCI\) via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: EPICS Tech Talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>, Ben Franksen <benjamin.franksen at helmholtz-berlin.de>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:13:16 +0000
This is interesting, thank you, but the intention here is to do this for an arbitrary record from a client tool over channel access.

Is the conclusion that this is not possible?

Thanks,
Willl


From: Tech-talk on behalf of Ben Franksen via Tech-talk
Sent: Friday, April 03, 2020 16:43
To: EPICS Tech Talk
Subject: Re: Setting an array to zero length

Am 03.04.20 um 17:28 schrieb Ben Franksen via Tech-talk:
> Am 03.04.20 um 16:25 schrieb Ralph Lange via Tech-talk:
>> On Fri, 3 Apr 2020 at 15:04, Ben Franksen via Tech-talk <
>> tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:
>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> You could also try to use another
>>> record with NELM=NORD=0 and that has an output link that you point to
>>> your WAVE record. There is no record type in base with such an output
>>> link [...]
>>>
>>
>> The aaoRecord since Base 3.12.2 (ca. 1995)
>
> Thanks I completely forgot about this one. Indeed this works:
>
> record(waveform, "wf") {
>     field(NELM, "10")
>     field(FTVL, "DOUBLE")
>     field(INP, [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8])
>     field(PINI, "YES")
> }
> record(aao, "reset") {
>     field(NELM, "0")
>     field(OUT, "wf PP")
> }
>
> ben@juliana[1]:.../base/7.0>caget wf
> wf 10 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 0
> ben@juliana[1]:.../base/7.0>caget wf.NORD
> wf.NORD                        8
> ben@juliana[1]:.../base/7.0>caput reset.PROC 1
> Old : reset.PROC                     0
> New : reset.PROC                     1
> ben@juliana[1]:.../base/7.0>caget wf.NORD
> wf.NORD                        0
> ben@juliana[1]:.../base/7.0>caget wf
> wf 10 2.50321e-308 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
>
> The last response is unexpected though. While caget -h indeed says:
>
> Arrays: Value format: print number of requested values, then list of values
>
> printing the actual number of values in the response (and only so many
> values) would be more useful. Does CA not return the current number of
> values in an array?

Ah, I see. This is a limitation of the simple ca_array_get call which is
used by default. It works as expected if I pass the -c option which
makes it use ca_array_get_callback which can return the current number
of elements.

Cheers
Ben
--
...it is impossible to speak of a depoliticized economy as the liberals
do, or of a separation between economic exploitation and political
oppression as the Marxists articulate. The basic distinction, rather, is
between power and creativity...
             -- Jonathan Nitzan and Shimshon Bichler: Capital as Power

 

-- 

This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential, copyright and or privileged material, and are for the use of the intended addressee only. If you are not the intended addressee or an authorised recipient of the addressee please notify us of receipt by returning the e-mail and do not use, copy, retain, distribute or disclose the information in or attached to the e-mail.
Any opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily of Diamond Light Source Ltd.
Diamond Light Source Ltd. cannot guarantee that this e-mail or any attachments are free from viruses and we cannot accept liability for any damage which you may sustain as a result of software viruses which may be transmitted in or with the message.
Diamond Light Source Limited (company no. 4375679). Registered in England and Wales with its registered office at Diamond House, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Didcot, Oxfordshire, OX11 0DE, United Kingdom
 


Replies:
Re: Setting an array to zero length Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: ci-scripts 2.2.1 available Ralph Lange via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Newport DL325 Igor Kriznar via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Setting an array to zero length Ben Franksen via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Setting an array to zero length Johnson, Andrew N. via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 08 Apr 2020 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·