EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024  2025  2026  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024  2025  2026 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used?
From: "Mooney, Tim M. via Tech-talk" <[email protected]>
To: "Hu, Yong" <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, "Murray, Doug" <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2023 19:09:52 +0000
One more point that hasn't been mentioned: custom code that isn't associated with a single record needs to use Channel Access, and SNL makes this easy, with ways to do Channel Access calls that would require lots of code - stuff like put-callback, acting on monitors, involving multiple execution threads, etc. So SNL is not obsolete, not even for problems that don't call for state machines.

Tim Mooney ([email protected]) (630)252-5417
Beamline Controls Group (www.aps.anl.gov)
Advanced Photon Source, Argonne National Lab


From: Tech-talk <[email protected]> on behalf of Murray, Doug via Tech-talk <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2023 10:22 AM
To: Hu, Yong <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used?
 

Thanks everyone for the great response, including all those sent to me personally.  To summarize those sent directly to me, they mirror what’s been indicated in this forum; the sequencer is indeed alive and well and used in a variety of settings at many (most?) EPICS sites.

But to answer your question Yong (and similar ones asked directly!) this comment about the sequencer came up in a small internal meeting with some people who are quite focused on very specific EPICS-related work that doesn’t require the sequencer.  SLAC has many hundreds of IOCs that do use the sequencer, so it’s great that EPICS as a toolkit can support a broad spectrum of users.

 

cheers

-doug

 

 

From: Hu, Yong <[email protected]>
Date: Friday, April 14, 2023 at 5:58 AM
To: Murray, Doug <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used?

This topic is becoming so hot that I cannot help jumping in. I cannot imagine a facility (not a simple lab setup) using EPICS without using Sequencer. Doug, is that meeting at SLAC just internal?

Yong HU
on behalf of NSLS-II using Sequencer


From: Tech-talk <[email protected]> on behalf of "Murray, Doug via Tech-talk" <[email protected]>
Reply to: "Murray, Doug" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, 13 April 2023 at 18:37
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Subject: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used?

 

At a recent meeting at SLAC, it was suggested that the EPICS Sequencer and its State Notation Language has become obsolete.  Are any sites other than SLAC still using this?  I assume so, but please let me know directly if your organization is using it, and I can summarize later.

 

cheers

-doug

 


Replies:
RE: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? [SEC=OFFICIAL] STARRITT, Andrew via Tech-talk
References:
Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? Murray, Doug via Tech-talk
Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? Simon Rose via Tech-talk
Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? Hu, Yong via Tech-talk
Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? Murray, Doug via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? Pierrick M Hanlet via Tech-talk
Next: About "Identical process variable names on multiple servers" with invalid address Perez Juarez, Emilio (DLSLtd, RAL, LSCI) via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024  2025  2026 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? Murray, Doug via Tech-talk
Next: RE: Is the Sequencer and SNL still widely used? [SEC=OFFICIAL] STARRITT, Andrew via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024  2025  2026 
ANJ, 19 Mar 2026 · Home · News · About · Talk · Base · Modules · Extensions ·
· Distributions · Download · Documents · Links · Licensing ·