Re: Adding additional fields to be archived in "policies.py"

[Gerrit Kühn via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

Am Fri, 6 Sep 2024 09:42:15 +0000
schrieb Timo Korhonen <Timo.Korhonen at ess.eu>:

> In that case I would say that the plugin should be enhanced to be able
> to get the status and severity fields. As I wrote, I am not familiar
> with the plugin so I cannot say how difficult that would be.
> 
> The important point is that the severity and status are "atomically"
> included in the data samples. If you pick them up as separate PVs, then
> you have to do (non-trivial) data sorting to figure out when the
> severity & status have changed.

Thank you for this thorough explanation. Looking at the plugin's issue
page, I just found this (maybe I should have looked there earlier and not
trusted Google that much):
https://github.com/sasaki77/archiverappliance-datasource/issues/156

So the author is already aware of the issue.


cu
  Gerrit

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature