On 09/25, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> So, the number of points as a double gets rounded down in the assignment
> type conversion. I'll try to fix this unless you or someone else beats
> me to it.
OK, I submitted PR #42 for this:
github.com/epics-modules/sscan/pull/42
Thanks,
Lewis
- References:
- Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
- Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types? William Badgett via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Same sscan record step size for all positioners not possible? J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk
- Next:
Support for 64 bit integer Normative Types? William Badgett via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
|