Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
I would agree with Andrew's statements, explicitly:
Don't merge mbbi/o and mbbi/oDirect, as their functionality is too
different, and we would end up with a big clumsy "all digital stuff in
one" record.
All these really good and reasonable ideas (32 bit, strings and alarm
stuff for each bit, reasonable startup and monitor behavior, maybe even
sending DBE_PROPERTY events...) should go in two new record types to
avoid breaking existing stuff.
The new records could also have a more descriptive name .... something
resembling "bitfield" or "bitset"?
Smells like Codeathon material...
Cheers,
Ralph
- References:
- RE: mbboDirect problem Allison, Stephanie
- Re: mbboDirect problem Dirk Zimoch
- Re: mbboDirect problem Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: mbboDirect problem Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Odd MEDM behavior on OS-X Josh Stein
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: mbboDirect problem Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: mbboDirect problem Dirk Zimoch
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
<2010>
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|
ANJ, 02 Sep 2010 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
·
Search
·
EPICS V4
·
IRMIS
·
Talk
·
Bugs
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|