Dear Everyone,
I just found that the tool "dbdToRecordTypeH" in base-R3.15 behaves differently compare to the previous version.
In the previous version, the tool put "include guard" for type definition.
But, the new one doesn't put the "include guard".
The "include guard" was very helpful to avoid duplicated type declaration due to the complicated include statements.
I would like to get it back to keep backward compatibility.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Kukhee
--------------------------------------------
Kukhee Kim
SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
2575 Sand Hill Rd, MS 64
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Email: [email protected]
Phone: (650)926-4912
Fax: (650)926-3800
- Replies:
- Re: Different behavior on dbdToRecordTypeH - include guard Andrew Johnson
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: read status nin "" 0 error with Eric Norum
- Next:
Re: read status nin "" 0 error with Eric Norum
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Acromag IP520 EPICS support Ron Sluiter
- Next:
Re: Different behavior on dbdToRecordTypeH - include guard Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
<2014>
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·