Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Marty Kraimer <[email protected]> · Mon, 12 Sep 2005 11:16:30 -0500

Andrew Johnson wrote:

I agree with Dayle that we should remove these records from base,

especially as they're already unbundled into modules/timing/apsEvent,

but I'm not 100% convinced we should do it in the middle of a major

release number - any comments either way from the floor?

- Andrew

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: Moving event generator and event receiver record support out

of base

Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:09:49 -0700 (PDT)
From: Dayle Kotturi <[email protected]>
To: Andrew Johnson <[email protected]>

Hi Andrew,

Can I put in a vote to pull er*Record and eg*Record support from

base/src/rec

in the next release? It's hardware support and doesn't belong with soft
ioc records. It's better in the site packages evg and evr.

Dayle

The device and driver support has already been removed from base for the

next 3.14 release.

This means that applications that use the APS event system already have

to make some changes.

This let them also get egRecord, egeventRecord, erRecord, and

ereventRecord from modules/timing/apsEvent.

As I recall at least some of these were modified for the SLS and later

event systems.

Marty

Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System