Maybe change the name?
alarmAckTransient -> alarmNoAckTransientLevel
Would that be more comprehensive? Or do you have a better idea?
Ralph
Marty Kraimer wrote:
Ralph Lange wrote:
Suggestion:
Change the type of alarmAckTransient from boolean to
menu(menuAlarmSevr) and redefine it as "highest level of alarm that
does not have to be acknowledged". Doesn't need more space in the DB
and allows for nice and subtle configuration options: e.g. warnings
that don't have to be ack'ed while errors do.
What do you think?
Sounds fine to me. I will change RecordCommon.wiki to
field(alarmAckTransient,menu(menuAlarmSevr)) {
# highest level of alarm that does not have to be acknowledged"
}
If there are objections it can always be changed back.
Marty
- Replies:
- Re: V4 DB RecordCommon: Suggestion for alarmAckTransient (ACKT replacement) Marty Kraimer
- References:
- V4 DB RecordCommon: Suggestion for alarmAckTransient (ACKT replacement) Ralph Lange
- Re: V4 DB RecordCommon: Suggestion for alarmAckTransient (ACKT replacement) Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Link arrays / syntax Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: Fwd: Control System Data Access API Marty Kraimer
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: V4 DB RecordCommon: Suggestion for alarmAckTransient (ACKT replacement) Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: V4 DB RecordCommon: Suggestion for alarmAckTransient (ACKT replacement) Marty Kraimer
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|