I had a very quick look, and it all looks perfectly reasonable
from this end.
We do need to be careful since this is a patch release. Therefore,
at some pouint a cvs diff based review might be in order.
Jeff
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Benjamin Franksen [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 16, 2005 10:17 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: R3.14.8 Status/logClient patch
>
>
> On Wednesday 16 November 2005 14:03, Benjamin Franksen wrote:
> > What should I do?
>
> Ok, problem solved. Everything is completely backward compatible now.
> See release notes snippet for details. The relevant section for the
> AppDevGuide is not yet done (it didn't contain anything until now).
> BTW, what is the source format for that, or is plain text ok?
>
> Ben
>
> PS: Attached tar file can be unpacked inside
> /path/to/base/src/libCom.
> It contains a patched Makefile and a snippet for the release notes.
>
- Replies:
- Re: R3.14.8 Status/logClient patch Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- Re: R3.14.8 Status/logClient patch Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: dbEvent.c line 665 Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: Build system problem Andrew Johnson
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: R3.14.8 Status/logClient patch Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: R3.14.8 Status/logClient patch Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
<2005>
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|