On Feb 24, 2006, at 12:27 , Benjamin Franksen wrote:
Take a look at this:
http://www.sics.se/~joe/ml9/doc.html
It's like XML only human readable and writeable. Much less verbose.
BTW, the author is an Erlang expert.
Well, I don't know about switching to ML9,
which primarily looks like a LaTeX replacement.
But the Erlang author has some slides about robust systems on
http://www.sics.se/~joe/talks/systems.pdf
One item in there is:
in order to be robust, processes _share nothing_,
message passing is the only way to exchange data,
and data must be copied.
"Good Stuff: Processes, Copying, Message Passing".
I guess the real-world situation of a V3 IOC,
with ideas to avoid copying arrays,
or the recent exception discussion where
some try to avoid copying or even generating the error message,
falls into his summary of
"Bad Shit: Threads, Sharing, Mutexes, ..."
Fun reading for a Friday afternoon.
-Kay
- Replies:
- RE: XML is dead, long live ML9 Jeff Hill
- References:
- XML is dead, long live ML9 Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
XML is dead, long live ML9 Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
RE: XML is dead, long live ML9 Jeff Hill
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
XML is dead, long live ML9 Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
RE: XML is dead, long live ML9 Jeff Hill
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|