Hi Han,
Which revision should this patch be applied against? That is, branch
name and/or git/bzr revision hash.
Michael
On 04/27/2017 07:38 PM, Jeong Han Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I did modify the records, which I mentioned in tech-talks as below:
> http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/tech-talk/2017/msg00690.php
>
> Main focus are the following three items
> 1. recGblResetAlarms returns unsigned short / epicsUInt16
> 2. recGblCheckDeadband uses "unsigned (int) / epicsUInt32
> 3. db_post_events uses "unsigned int / epicsUInt32
>
> So, I decided to minimize any changes on the monitor functions.
>
> Please let me know what you think.
>
> Thanks,
> Han
>
>
- Replies:
- Re: Patch file for Records which use consistent epics data types Jeong Han Lee
- References:
- Patch file for Records which use consistent epics data types Jeong Han Lee
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Patch file for Records which use consistent epics data types Jeong Han Lee
- Next:
Re: Patch file for Records which use consistent epics data types Jeong Han Lee
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Patch file for Records which use consistent epics data types Jeong Han Lee
- Next:
Re: Patch file for Records which use consistent epics data types Jeong Han Lee
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
<2017>
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|