Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

On 7/24/19 1:02 PM, Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk wrote:
> I don't think anyone has suggested using clock_getres() for the quantum value before; that might be a better solution than just returning zero. Anyone else want to weigh in on that idea — should we just apply Dirk's patch?

cf. the posix version of epicsMonotonicResolution()

I've never looked at what is returned for CLOCK_REALTIME (which is always present).

I think the ultimate fallback has to be returning zero.  1e-3 is too arbitrary.

Replies:

Re: Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Zimoch Dirk (PSI) via Core-talk

References:

Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Zimoch Dirk (PSI) via Core-talk

Re: Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Zimoch Dirk (PSI) via Core-talk

Re: Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Next: EPICS 7.0.3 Release tasks Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <2019>  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Next: Re: Misleading "initPeriodic: Scan rate ... is not achievable" and sleep quantum implementation Zimoch Dirk (PSI) via Core-talk

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  <2019>  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024