Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

Terminology.

Am 20.04.20 um 23:37 schrieb Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk:
> On Apr 20, 2020, at 2:48 PM, Ralph Lange via Core-talk
> Also, any rules for the generation of the report files should be
> pattern rules that only apply to the expected targets. It is very
> hard to work around something like the existing implicit "%.xml:
> %.tap" rule when - like in the Google Test case - the test executable
> creates both xml and tap output directly.
> 
> That’s fine, I don’t see a problem with using pattern rules for
> these, see below.
> [...]
> -%.tap: %.t

This is a pattern rule.

> +$(TAPFILES): %.tap: %.t

This is a static pattern rule.

I am sure you two are aware of the difference, but people not so
familiar with GNU make intricacies may be confused.

Cheers
Ben

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Replies:

Re: tapfiles double-colon rule Ralph Lange via Core-talk

References:

tapfiles double-colon rule Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Re: tapfiles double-colon rule Ralph Lange via Core-talk

Re: tapfiles double-colon rule Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Navigate by Date:

Prev: Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:dbChannelForDBLinks into epics-base:7.0 mdavidsaver via Core-talk

Next: Re: [Merge] ~dirk.zimoch/epics-base:dbChannelForDBLinks into epics-base:7.0 Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <2020>  2021  2022  2023  2024 

Navigate by Thread:

Prev: Re: tapfiles double-colon rule Johnson, Andrew N. via Core-talk

Next: Re: tapfiles double-colon rule Ralph Lange via Core-talk

Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <2020>  2021  2022  2023  2024