EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024  Index 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: [Bug 1868486] Re: epicsMessageQueue lost messages
From: Andrew Johnson via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: core-talk at aps.anl.gov
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 04:25:12 -0000
AFAIK the Github PR #73 fixed all the faults we could find in the
original code, and added tests. This PR was merged into 3.15.8 and
marked as Fix Released there; I just merged the 3.15 branch into 7.0 so
this fix has been incorporated and I'm adding the 7.0.3.2 milestone back
again.

Unfortunately the RTEMS implementation of osdMessageQueue.cpp seems to
be failing the new epicsMessageQueue tests, but that's a different issue
since it's a different implementation...

** Changed in: epics-base/7.0
       Status: In Progress => Fix Committed

** Changed in: epics-base/7.0
    Milestone: None => 7.0.3.2

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of EPICS
Core Developers, which is subscribed to EPICS Base.
Matching subscriptions: epics-core-list-subscription
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1868486

Title:
  epicsMessageQueue lost messages

Status in EPICS Base:
  Fix Committed
Status in EPICS Base 3.15 series:
  Fix Released
Status in EPICS Base 7.0 series:
  Fix Committed

Bug description:
  https://epics.anl.gov/core-talk/2020/msg00396.php

  Mark Rivers observed epicsMessageQueue losing messages.

  https://epics.anl.gov/core-talk/2020/msg00408.php

  > I think I see the logic error in how the eventSent flag is handled,
  > specifically related to the fact that epicsEvent is a semaphore as
  > opposed to a condition variable.
  > 
  > This allows a "race" to occur if the first/only waiting receiver
  > times out, and epicsEventWaitWithTimeout() returns, while a sender
  > is in epicsMessageQueueSend() preparing to wake up a receiver.
  > 
  > This results in a situation where the sender has set the eventSent,
  > and indeed copied a message to the buffer of, a thread which has
  > decided to abort.
  > 
  > After timing out, the receiver sees the timeout and returns -1
  > even through eventSent has been set.  This can be trapped with:
  > 
  > > b osdMessageQueue.cpp:358 if status!=0 && threadNode.eventSent
  > 
  > So here is your lost message.
  > 
  > Now when epicsMessageQueueReceiveWithTimeout() is called again, no message
  > is waiting in the queue, so epicsEventWaitWithTimeout() is called.
  > Since the semaphore is already set, this returns immediately with status==0,
  > but this is a spurious wakeup and the eventSent flag is not set.
  > 
  > And here is the second "timeout".

  Line numbers circa 7.0.3.1

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epics-base/+bug/1868486/+subscriptions

References:
[Bug 1868486] [NEW] epicsMessageQueue lost messages mdavidsaver via Core-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: [Bug 1842086] Re: TestHarness should be TESTPROD instead of PROD Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
Next: Jenkins build is back to stable : epics-7.0 » linux32 #224 APS Jenkins via Core-talk
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: [Bug 1868486] Re: epicsMessageQueue lost messages mdavidsaver via Core-talk
Next: [Bug 1868486] Re: epicsMessageQueue lost messages Andrew Johnson via Core-talk
Index: 2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 28 May 2020 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·