> (No such problem on Linux where all functions inside the shared library are visible.)
That is true by default, but GCC >= 4 has __attribute__ ((visibility ("hidden"))) which will also hide classes on Linux.
This article makes the argument for why it is a good idea to use it:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Visibility
Mark
________________________________
From: Core-talk <core-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of Ralph Lange via Core-talk <core-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 5:01 AM
To: EPICS Core Talk
Subject: Unit tests on Windows DLL internals
Question about developing on Windows:
How do you manage unit testing of internal classes in DLLs?
Internal classes (that are not DLL exported) are by design not visible through the DLL interface, which means linking a unit test against the DLL won't allow it to access the internal APIs it is supposed to test.
(No such problem on Linux where all functions inside the shared library are visible.)
I know I can work around by linking the needed objects directly into the test executable. Is there any preferable or better solution?
Thanks,
~Ralph
- References:
- Unit tests on Windows DLL internals Ralph Lange via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: A general question about convert e.g. in longout record drvh, drvl handling Heinz Junkes via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: Unit tests on Windows DLL internals Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Unit tests on Windows DLL internals Ralph Lange via Core-talk
- Next:
Re: Unit tests on Windows DLL internals Michael Davidsaver via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
|