I believe %z is supported in Visual Studio 2015 and later. Have we said
that older versions are no longer supported?
I have not tested %z on vxWorks 6.9.4.1, which is what we use at the
APS, but I think Andrew would have noticed if it did not work? What is
the minimum version of vxWorks currently supported?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of EPICS
Core Developers, which is subscribed to EPICS Base.
Matching subscriptions: epics-core-list-subscription
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1952074
Title:
Using %z in printf is not portable
Status in EPICS Base:
New
Bug description:
Some code in EPICS uses printf with the z format modifier for size_t arguments, as in "%zu". This is not portable. VxWorks (at least up to version 6.9.0) does not understand this and prints "zu" and then shifts all the remaining arguments to the wrong format specifier!
Older Windows versions use "%Iu" for the same purpose.
Affected code:
modules/libcom/src/error/errlog.c (2x)
modules/libcom/test/epicsErrlogTest.c
modules/libcom/test/yajl_test.c (2x)
modules/pvAccess/pvtoolsSrc/pvlist.cpp (2x)
modules/pvAccess/src/ioc/reftrackioc.cpp (2x)
modules/pvAccess/src/remote/blockingUDPTransport.cpp (4x)
modules/pvAccess/src/remote/codec.cpp (2x)
modules/pvAccess/src/remote/transportRegistry.cpp
modules/pvAccess/src/server/responseHandlers.cpp
modules/pvAccess/testApp/remote/testChannelConnect.cpp
modules/pvAccess/testApp/remote/testmonitorfifo.cpp (4x)
modules/pvData/src/factory/FieldCreateFactory.cpp (2x)
modules/pvData/testApp/pv/performstruct.cpp (2x)
modules/pvData/testApp/pv/testPVData.cpp
modules/pva2pva/pdbApp/pdbgroup.cpp
modules/pva2pva/pdbApp/pvalink.cpp (3x)
modules/pva2pva/pdbApp/pvalink_jlif.cpp
modules/pva2pva/testApp/testpdb.cpp (2x)
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/epics-base/+bug/1952074/+subscriptions
- References:
- [Bug 1952074] [NEW] Using %z in printf is not portable Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
[Bug 1952074] Re: Using %z in printf is not portable rivers via Core-talk
- Next:
[Bug 1952074] Re: Using %z in printf is not portable Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
[Bug 1952074] Re: Using %z in printf is not portable rivers via Core-talk
- Next:
[Bug 1952074] Re: Using %z in printf is not portable Dirk Zimoch via Core-talk
- Index:
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
<2021>
2022
2023
2024
|