We're trying to get to the point where we can use a couple of Heurikon
"Nitro-260" as iocs' in one of our systems that's heavily loaded. It's
currently using 'mv167-s which are a bit too busy for comfort.
In order to do so, we need to configure the system with a lot of features
(like NFS, etc) turned on, which is not the way the kernel was configured
from Heurikon.
We got a copy of the 5.2 BSP from heurikon, and integrated it with the
BSPs that we already had. After a little fooling around, we got the BSP
to compile with no complaint.
When we try to boot the newly-built BSP, the boot-loader crashes. It _looks_
like perhaps part of the boot-loader is getting over-written by the down-
loaded kernel. We're using the original EPROMS (5.1.1) which worked ok with
the original supplied kernel, but it seems like that ought to be ok. It
seems like it's been a long time since there was a fatal conflict between a
new kernel and a previous boot-prom set.
Does anyone have any ideas about what I'm overlooking? It's probably just
a "one-liner" in config.whosis, but I can't seem to figure it out. I sent
email to Heurikon yesterday, but so far there has been no reply. The target-
specific reference and the vxw 5.2 doc's haven't enlightened me; I've at
least tried to "RTFM!" And a Fine Manual it is, too!
Any hints, pointers, (constructive) flames, etc. will be appreciated.
-bill
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: I'm just trying to follow orders... Deb Kerstiens
- Next:
Re: building vxWorks for nitro-260 John R. Winans
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: I'm just trying to follow orders... Deb Kerstiens
- Next:
Re: building vxWorks for nitro-260 John R. Winans
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|