Marty Kraimer wrote:
>
>Noboru Yamamoto wrote:
>>
>> Ratio of CPU performances estimated from these numbers is,
>>
>> frc40:frc64:frc604RT=1:1.3:4.1
>
>I am not sure what should be reported but another way is % cpu
>usage which is (100 - IDLE). This would give.
>
>68040 26.8%
>68060 22.1%
>frc604 5.1%
>
>Using 68040 as base and reporting as (68040 cpu)/(xxx cpu) gives
>
>frc40:frc64:frc604RT=1:1.2:5.25
Numbers I quoted as a ratio are
sqrt( average((ScanPeriod CPU 040)/(ScanPeriod CPU xx))
* average((100- IDLE CPU 040)/(100 - IDLE CPU xxx))).
Average is take over scanperiods( 1 second to 0.1 second).
>
>Not sure which way makes most sense but they give similar results.
>
>I am really suprised by the 68060 numbers. Could you please
>tell us the following:
>
>For each cpu give
> a) Speed of main memory.
> b) Speed and size of cache memory.
>
>Also are you sure all board support packages turned cache on?
>
>Also is it possible to make up a small test case that just
>has a loop to does an integer multiply and another loop that
>does a double multiply? Make sure compiler doesnt optimize everything
>away. This test should show raw cpu performance.
>The database test may just be dependent on main memory speed
>and size of cache.
>
I will report it later.
>
>Marty Kraimer
Johny Tang wrote:
>
>Since the EPICS benchmark includes running medm,
>100-IDEL measure takes CA clients and network
>performance facts. % CPU on scanPeriod doesn't.
>
>Noboru, can you also show the % CPU on CA tasks ?
>
At the moment, I don't have % CPU on CA task on CPU64.
For CPU40 and CPU604, we got
CPU40 CPU604
scan CA event CPU CA event
1 sec 1.9% 0.2%
.5 sec 3.9% 0.5%
.2 sec 9.5% 1.4%
.1 sec 19.1%
We use 10Mb Ethernet and HP735/755 running HP-UX9.05.
Version of EPICS is 3.12.2.
>
>Johnny Tang
>
>--
>_____________________________________________
>
>Johnny Tang
>
>Tel: (757)269-7239
>Fax: (757)269-7049
>E-Mail: [email protected]
>
>Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility
>(CEBAF)
>Accelerator Software Control
>12000 Jefferson Avenue, MS 85A
>Newport News, Virginia 23606
>_____________________________________________
Noboru Yamamoto
KEKB Accelerator Control Group
KEK, JAPAN
Fax:+81-298-64-0321
Tel:+81-298-64-5309
e-mail:[email protected]
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
CapFast follies Bret Goodrich
- Next:
frcX vs. mvmeX on performance Johnny Tang
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: frc64/frc604RT performance KAJI Masahiro
- Next:
Enhanced vxWorks Variable support Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
<1996>
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|