Hi:
It's Friday, so I couldn't keep myself from jumping onto this thread....
Java seems to be the main reason why (and language in which)
people want to re-write CA client code.
In theory, that might be smaller & cleaner than
the original because Java provides platform independent
network access, threads, signals, exceptions, ...
So it's a real worthwhile effort.
Does this work in reality or is every new JDK just
different enough and we open another can of worms,
just this time in a half-interpreted language,
after K&R C, ANSI C, Posix, STL, C++ standard library
are all failed standards that force us to implement libCom,
most of which only exists in order to provide one API
regardless of hardware, OS & compiler?
Sorry,
-Kay
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: CA protocol documentation. Porter, Rodney
- Next:
Channel Watcher V2.0 Zelazny, Michael S.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: CA protocol documentation. Porter, Rodney
- Next:
myPV.o(.gnu.linkonce.d._vt.4myPV+0x24): undefined reference to `casPV::destroy(void)' Clinton Smith
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
<2002>
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|