Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <2003> 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024	Index	1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <2003> 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
<== Date ==>		<== Thread ==>

Subject:	NI1014 GPIB controller
From:	Marty Kraimer <[email protected]>
To:	[email protected]
Date:	Mon, 14 Apr 2003 07:13:02 -0500

Has anyone successfully used SRQs with the NI1014?

Another way of asking is has anyone successfully used GPIBREADW,
or GPIBEFASTIW with the NI1014 GPIB interface.

Does anyone really require DMA?

If programed transfers are used instead of DMA there are two big advantages.

1) A24 DMA is no longer required. Thus it will no longer be necessary
to modify the board support packages in order to support the NI1014.

2) The driver could be modified to support other GPIB controllers that
use an NEC uPD7210-compatible register set.

Marty Kraimer

Navigate by Date:: Prev: ways to add driver support layer for rtems ioc M.C.Shao; Next: Re: how to prevent ioc app from being built for both target and host? Marty Kraimer; Index: 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <2003> 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024
Navigate by Thread:: Prev: ways to add driver support layer for rtems ioc M.C.Shao; Next: RE: NI1014 GPIB controller Mark Rivers; Index: 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 <2003> 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024

ANJ, 10 Aug 2010