Marty wrote:
> If programed transfers are used instead of DMA there are two big advantages.
> 1) A24 DMA is no longer required. Thus it will no longer be necessary
> to modify the board support packages in order to support the NI1014.
I'm not quite sure I understand what you mean by this. Are you suggesting eliminating support for A24 DMA entirely in the BSP, or just for some quirk of the NI1014? We use the Kinetic Systems 2917 VME/CAMAC adapter, which uses A24 DMA. We definitely need to be able to continue to use these, there are a dozen or more in use on beamlines where they control a critical CAMAC device for multi-element fluorescence detectors.
Mark Rivers
- Replies:
- Re: NI1014 GPIB controller Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: drvAscii R3.14 version Kevin Tsubota
- Next:
RE: recDynLink.c for R3.14.1 ? Feng, Shuchen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
<2003>
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
NI1014 GPIB controller Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: NI1014 GPIB controller Marty Kraimer
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
<2003>
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|