I have successfully put together a soft IOC which consists of a number "Soft Channel" type of records. These are mostly longin, one ot two bo and mbbo, and one genSub. In the edm companion for this IOC, I have a number of text controls to put new values into all the records with the exception of the genSub record. There is a Message Button in the edm program which is used to trigger processing of the genSub record, When genSub is processed it takes the values from all the other records, performs some calculations, creates a string of numeric values and prints the results. All works fine.
Next step in the evolution of this learning exercise is to output the calculated result to a GPIB CAMAC crate controller (in this case KS3988). I do not know how to do that.
I am using asyn.
1. genSub is not part of EPICS nor asyn. There is no DSET_xx type of definition
for it that I can find.
2. In my case I do not need a gpibCmd for it, but it seems to me that I need to
have the device( genSub, GPIB_IO, devyyxxxx, "XXXXX") statement, so that I can
specify that the output is GPIB_IO...
What do I need to do to accomplish that?
I have tried a few combinations and either the IOC generates a linking error or crashes with segmentation fault when the IOC is initialized. I guess, I need an example showing how to do that. I see in "myExample" (chapter 2 in EPICS IOC Application Developer's Guide) how to add a use defined "Soft Channel" type record.
Once I overcome the previous difficulty, I think I will have another problem to solve. This is what I am worried about.
1. When I send a certain combination of numberic values to KS3988, it should be
ready to return some data. That is, sending it some sequence of numbers
prepares the crate controller to return some numeric results.
2. I am thinking to have a forward link in the genSub record to a waveform record
which would be setup to read from the GPIB controller. Is it guaranteed that
the waveform record is processed after the genSub record has sent the command
bytes to the controller? If not, what should I do to assure properly timed
execution of the two records?
Many thanks in advance,
Zen
- Replies:
- Re: genSub Tim Mooney
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: fedora core 7 medm (was >> Re: MEDM compile - update :) Mauro Giacchini
- Next:
Re: genSub Tim Mooney
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: fedora core 7 medm (was >> Re: MEDM compile - update :) Robert Soliday
- Next:
Re: genSub Tim Mooney
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
<2007>
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|