On 12/21/2016 08:33 PM, Shen, Guobao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks very much for all your suggestions those you sent me directly and
> to the list.
> The alive record seems an alternative to what we are using here, the
> RecSync module developed by M. Davidsaver.
Recsync is now being maintained by Dylan Maxwell.
https://github.com/ChannelFinder/recsync
Recsync is intended to maintain a authoritative central database of all
records provided by all IOCs. In order to be authoritative, each IOC
maintains a persistent TCP connection to a central server. This gives
some feature overlap with aliveRecord*.
Zero configuration is a goal. No per-IOC config is required. Just link
in the reccaster support module. There is an optional .db which
provides connection status.
While intended to be used with channelfinder, it is not tightly coupled,
and could be used with other databases.
* In my ideal super efficient world, aliveRecord would use the recsync
protocol.
- Replies:
- Re: IOC and its OS health monitoring Dohn Arms
- References:
- IOC and its OS health monitoring Shen, Guobao
- Re: IOC and its OS health monitoring Shen, Guobao
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Alive record server Phillip Sorensen
- Next:
Re: IOC and its OS health monitoring Dohn Arms
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: IOC and its OS health monitoring Shen, Guobao
- Next:
Re: IOC and its OS health monitoring Dohn Arms
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
<2016>
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|