EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Quantalux sCMOS camera
From: Mark Rivers via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: "Miceli, Antonino" <amiceli at anl.gov>
Cc: tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 12:41:40 +0000
I see the HTML table did not come through tech-talk well so I have attached it as an image.

Mark


________________________________
From: Mark Rivers
Sent: Wednesday, March 4, 2020 6:31 AM
To: Miceli, Antonino
Cc: tech-talk
Subject: Re: Quantalux sCMOS camera


Hi Nino,


I don't think there is a driver, someone else asked about another Thorlabs camera a few weeks ago.


I wrote to Thorlabs and asked if their cameras are GenICam compliant.  They said that they are not, so it is not possible to use ADAravis with their cameras. A new driver based on their SDK (Windows only) would need to be written.


What is the application and requirements for this camera?


Here is a comparison of that camera with 2 FLIR cameras:


        ThorLabs Quantalux
        FLIR GS3-U3-23S6M-C
        FLIR GS3-U3-32S4M-C

Pixels (HxV)
        1920x1080
        1920x1200
        2048x1536

Frames/s
        50
        163
        121

Full well capacity (e-)
        23,000
        33,000
        10,500

RMS read noise (e-)
        1.5
        7.0
        2.3

Price
        $3,172
        $1,045
        $1,025


So both of the FLIR cameras are faster, have more pixels, and are cheaper.  One has a 50% larger full-well capacity than the ThorLabs, the other is 50% smaller.  One has ~4 times the read noise, the other about 50% more.  But even 7e- read noise is only significant if the pixels have fewer than about 50e- total; if they have more than 50- then the shot noise (sqrt(50)) dominates.  Is this a very low-light application?

Mark


________________________________
From: Tech-talk <tech-talk-bounces at aps.anl.gov> on behalf of Miceli, Antonino via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
Sent: Tuesday, March 3, 2020 9:09 PM
To: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov >> EPICS Tech Talk
Subject: Quantalux sCMOS camera

Hi

Has anyone written EPICS support for or have experience with the Quantalux sCMOS camera from Thorlabs?
https://www.thorlabs.com/newgrouppage9.cfm?objectgroup_id=11421

I guess it considerable cheaper the Andor version.

Thanks,
Nino

Attachment: ThorLabs.png
Description: ThorLabs.png


References:
Quantalux sCMOS camera Miceli, Antonino via Tech-talk
Re: Quantalux sCMOS camera Mark Rivers via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: Quantalux sCMOS camera Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
Next: AW: pco Camera USB and IEEE interface Sintschuk, Michael via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: Quantalux sCMOS camera Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
Next: RE: Asyn support for GPIB-ENET Mark Rivers via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  <20202021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 04 Mar 2020 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·