EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: netDev "channels" record type problem
From: Shuei YAMADA via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: Владимир Сергейчик <vladimirsergeychik2002 at gmail.com>
Cc: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2023 21:32:19 +0900
Hi Vlad,

First of all I have two questions:

Which version of netDev and EPICS base are you using?

Why don't you use ai records for IR:something:T1 (or T2) instead of ao records?

regards,
Shuei

p.s.
Currently I'm on vacation and I don't have access to our working
version of netDev. I'll look into it when I get back

2023年8月7日(月) 18:34 Владимир Сергейчик via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>:

>
> Hello everyone! I want to read out data from GM10 data logger, using netDev "channels" record type (it turns the set of PVs into an array). However, I have encountered some problem: I need to use "Passive" SCAN mode for the elements of that array, however, it would work only if I add .PROC CA to the FLNK line:
>
> field(FLNK,"IR:something:T1.") -> field(FLNK,"IR:something:T1.PROC CA")
>
> Only in this case it starts working properly. (By "working properly" I mean that while processing the data from datalogger both individual PV and the corresponding element of the array change simultaneously, while in other case the element of array changes whereas the value of a particular PV remains unchanged). Meanwhile, while looking at scripts of other users, they do not use .PROC CA addition and everything works OK.
>
> Could you explain why the field(FLNK,"IR:something:T1.") (without .PROC CA) doesn't work and how it can be fixed (because simple adding of .PROC CA doesn't seem to be a correct solution, otherwise other users would also add it).
>
> For better understanding of the context, I attach the example db-file. The first record is "channels" record type (which is array), and two others are scalar PV.
>
> Thanks,
> Vladimir



--
                 ----------------------------------------------------
                 Shuei Yamada,
                 High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK)
                 mailto:shuei at post.kek.jp
                 ----------------------------------------------------

Replies:
Re: netDev "channels" record type problem Владимир Сергейчик via Tech-talk
References:
netDev "channels" record type problem Владимир Сергейчик via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: netDev "channels" record type problem Arnold, Ned D. via Tech-talk
Next: Re: problem reading data from PLC S7NODAVE Maren Purves via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: netDev "channels" record type problem Arnold, Ned D. via Tech-talk
Next: Re: netDev "channels" record type problem Владимир Сергейчик via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  <20232024 
ANJ, 08 Aug 2023 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·