Re: urldefense.us URLs? (was: New Git mirror for the SNL-Sequencer (code and docs))

[Maren Purves via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>]

Completely understand for those of you who have that problem - it does
work in gmail (Firefox on  Windows 10)

Maren

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 9:08 PM Simon Rose via Tech-talk
<tech-talk at aps.anl.gov> wrote:
>
> Just as an addenda on this: in a recent post by Michael's he added this link:
>
> https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://mdavidsaver.github.io/pvxs/building.html*including-pvxs-in-your-application__;Iw!!G_uCfscf7eWS!fHEOo4xoss1gV1KpVm1gkVI_Cteoe-j1WIHSJ7hxa2ia6is5MXKbHYsoUYR9uDi4Zcaz_bB066FhF-14yFGfov33$
>
> which, when passed through urldefense, is completely broken (at least in mac outlook) as it chops the link after "building.html", rendering it an invalid link on urldefense. Moreover, if you try copy and paste the middle section (as was advised by Andrew), it doesn't work as it converts the # anchor into a different character.
>
> This is perhaps as much an issue with the mac version of outlook as it is with urldefense, but it is nevertheless annoying to get an email with a link that I can neither click on nor copy and paste.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simon
>
> On 2024-04-09, 20:05, "J. Lewis Muir via Tech-talk" <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov <mailto:tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>> wrote:
>
>
> On 04/02, J. Lewis Muir wrote:
> > On 04/02, Johnson, Andrew N. wrote:
> > > I don't think we're going to get an exception from the URL rewriting implemented by ProofPoint. I considered the idea of trying to strip it out before writing messages to the tech-talk archive, but that's not easy. Many emails now come base64-encoded with multi-part content, and if a message containing a decorated URL is signed, stripping the decoration off would break that signature. Note that ProofPoint do recognize signed messages and don't try to decorate the signed sections, so if you want your messages to not get decorated sign them before sending to the list.
> > >
> > > Below are some excerpts from Argonne's FAQ about ProofPoint. I've personally stopped worrying about this, it does work as advertised for me.
> >
> > Bummer. :-( As I'm sure you know, I completely disagree with this for
> > the reasons I already stated upthread. Any chance of hosting the EPICS
> > mailing lists elsewhere then?
>
>
> Any word on hosting the EPICS mailing lists elsewhere? Or, is there
> anything I could do to help with requesting an exception? ANL's policy
> is just crazy here. I can see forcing their policy on ANL employees
> when mail is delivered to each of their inboxes, but this is happening
> on a mailing list that, by definition, has no inbox. If ANL is going
> to do this kind of URL rewriting, it should be done before delivery to
> each ANL employee's inbox, not before being sent to all the recipients
> of a mailing list. And I don't think I mentioned it earlier, but it
> also messes up the mailing list archives because now URLs are wrapped in
> these urldefense.us URLs, which means the urldefense.us URLs must remain
> valid and functional for as long as the archives are expected to last.
>
>
> Lewis
>
>
>