EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025 Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: Archiver Appliance - Limit on PVs
From: Eusebio Naif Al-Soliman Fuentes via Tech-talk <tech-talk at aps.anl.gov>
To: Sky Brewer <sky.brewer at ess.eu>
Cc: tech-talk at aps.anl.gov
Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 12:16:49 +0100
Hello Sky.
 
Regarding the disk speed, I've tested it with "hdparm" and the "/dev/sdb" partition (in which the "/var" directory is mounted) has the following results:
 

sudo hdparm -Tt /dev/sdb

/dev/sdb:
 Timing cached reads:   19774 MB in  1.99 seconds = 9935.12 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads: 4084 MB in  3.00 seconds = 1361.22 MB/sec

Also, the STS is, in theory, mounted in the "/var" disk, along side the MTS and the LTS. In the sampleStartup.sh file I've the following lines:
 
# Set the location of short term and long term stores; this is necessary only if your policy demands it
export ARCHAPPL_SHORT_TERM_FOLDER=/var/arch/sts/
export ARCHAPPL_MEDIUM_TERM_FOLDER=/var/arch/mts/
export ARCHAPPL_LONG_TERM_FOLDER=/var/arch/lts/
 
I don't know if there is another file which overwrites this configuration.
 
Finally, thanks for the advise with the JVM memory. I thought there was only 1 instance of Java instead of 4.
 
Thanks, Eusebio.

---

Saludos/Best regards

University of Granada  

Eusebio Naif Al-Soliman Fuentes
MSc. Data Science and Computer Engineering

eunaif at correo.ugr.es



El 2025-01-31 14:32, Sky Brewer via Tech-talk escribió:
Hi Eusebio,

You shouldn’t have any performance problems with that setup for the Archiver Appliance, and you shouldn’t need more appliances unless you are in the 100 000 PV range (on a larger machine).

It’s very hard to debug performance problems, even harder from a distance. Some initial ideas


  *   How fast is the write interface to the var disk
  *   Is the STS on the var disk? Using RAM or the primary disk might help here.
  *   The JVM I believe takes whatever you give it, if you are running out of memory you should reduce what you gave it here. The sampleStartup.sh creates a tomcat per war file, so that’s 4x whatever memory you changed in the script. Since you have 8GB, probably 1GB is a safe number.

Deployments of the Archiver Appliance unfortunately is still quite site dependent and varied. Something I hope to improve by providing docker containers etc.

Some ideas:
There is a docker container version with all webapps in one instance https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/*github.com/archiver-appliance/epicsarchiverap/pkgs/container/epicsarchiverap/336979389?tag=singletomcat-61c7442__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZB5ixC9H9C2CsDUMxdsywR6idGZy4zDBWSUwLuOmWoPyYfQAJ_pV37sgR7lQIGSjEEbabw1POYKd8RRrqkao4Ugg$__;Lw!!D9dNQwwGXtA!X6m_pUxk0nwIIbWXuig5HBrRAi2e6B4-pHmrbV8JWWP0JlUp_g-qx481_gQB5aqMtwUa7k64dI64FkiUqXAMQSVq$  

A variety of startup scripts in https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/*github.com/archiver-appliance/epicsarchiverap/tree/master/docs/docs/source/samples__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZB5ixC9H9C2CsDUMxdsywR6idGZy4zDBWSUwLuOmWoPyYfQAJ_pV37sgR7lQIGSjEEbabw1POYKd8RRrqnP_f8Fw$__;Lw!!D9dNQwwGXtA!X6m_pUxk0nwIIbWXuig5HBrRAi2e6B4-pHmrbV8JWWP0JlUp_g-qx481_gQB5aqMtwUa7k64dI64FkiUqS8AYc95$  

Can’t remember if this is accessible outside of Sweden/Denmark, but ESS ansible deployment repository https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://urldefense.us/v3/__https:/*gitlab.esss.lu.se/ics-ansible-galaxy/ics-ans-role-epicsarchiverap__;!!G_uCfscf7eWS!ZB5ixC9H9C2CsDUMxdsywR6idGZy4zDBWSUwLuOmWoPyYfQAJ_pV37sgR7lQIGSjEEbabw1POYKd8RRrqsME4Gdv$__;Lw!!D9dNQwwGXtA!X6m_pUxk0nwIIbWXuig5HBrRAi2e6B4-pHmrbV8JWWP0JlUp_g-qx481_gQB5aqMtwUa7k64dI64FkiUqTM3EKxW$   (not updated for 2.05)

Hope that helps

Sky

Replies:
Re: Archiver Appliance - Limit on PVs Eusebio Naif Al-Soliman Fuentes via Tech-talk
References:
RE: Re: Archiver Appliance - Limit on PVs Sky Brewer via Tech-talk

Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: equivalent functionality to iocStats for PVA Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
Next: about css Mayou Hasegawa via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: RE: Re: Archiver Appliance - Limit on PVs Sky Brewer via Tech-talk
Next: Re: Archiver Appliance - Limit on PVs Eusebio Naif Al-Soliman Fuentes via Tech-talk
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  1998  1999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  <2025
ANJ, 13 Feb 2025 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions ·
· Download · Search · IRMIS · Talk · Documents · Links · Licensing ·