Experimental Physics and Industrial Control System
|
|
Hello,
I was curious if there has been any discussion in the community about implementing a Channel Access provider for PVXS? I think most would agree the PVXS API is much easier to work with than the pvAccessCPP API, however one thing pvAccessCPP has over PVXS is
it also provides a CA provider(epics::pvAccess::ca::CAClientFactory::start(); pvac::ClientProvider provider("ca");).
Any new client applications will likely need to support both CA and PVA (except maybe for some very new sites which are trying PVA only) so it is especially useful to have a single API for the EPICS communication layer of such an application. The way I see
it, a C++ EPICS client which is to support both CA and PVA will need to use PVXS for PVA and the C API for Channel Access or alternatively stick with pvAccessCPP. This isn't the end of the world, but it sure would be nice to use PVXS for both protocols. I'm
interested to hear others' thoughts on this.
Thanks,
Nick Marks
|
- Replies:
- Re: CA Provider for PVXS Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk
- Re: CA Provider for PVXS Michael Davidsaver via Tech-talk
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
RE: CS-Studio rules on X/Y Plot Pearson, Matthew via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: CA Provider for PVXS Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Epicsarchiver-retrieval-client Sky Brewer via Tech-talk
- Next:
Re: CA Provider for PVXS Kasemir, Kay via Tech-talk
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
<2026>
|
|
ANJ, 08 Jun 2026 |
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Talk
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
·
Distributions
·
Download
·
Documents
·
Links
·
Licensing
·
|