|
Subject: |
Re: Limits on CA message size? |
|
From: |
[email protected] (John R. Winans) |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 May 94 08:36:54 CDT |
Steve Lewis writes:
> Note that some clients like dm carefully keep only one connection per IOC.
> Others may not. Again, Jeff and/or Andy can confirm what the demand is
> for each instance of a sequencer: It uses CA but not TCP/IP, therefore,
> it may be smart enough to not need the buffer.
Why is not CA responsible for this junk? Why should the user programs
have to worry about it?
If CA handled this problem itself, we would have this problem solved in one
single place... once and for all.
--John
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Living on and on... Deb Kerstiens
- Next:
Re: Limits on CA message size? watson
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Limits on CA message size? Andy Kozubal
- Next:
Re: Limits on CA message size? watson
- Index:
<1994>
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
| 
·
Home
·
News
·
About
·
Base
·
Modules
·
Extensions
·
Distributions
·
Download
·