|
Subject: |
Re: string to binary conversion in the db |
|
From: |
[email protected] (William Lupton) |
|
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 95 09:25:27 HST |
Jeff writes:
> Currently if CA sends a string to a binary database field we
> check in record support for an explicit match with the name of
> one of the states. If this fails shouldnt we also match for "0","1",
> ... matching a valid state so that it is easier to write (and
> use) ascii based tools?
That seems like a good idea ... has anyone considered permitting abbreviation
to significant length of supplied string too, possibly useful when using text
entry for such a field? ... or case-independence?
William
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
string to binary conversion in the db Jeff Hill
- Next:
Observations on EPICS Alpha port & DEC support of VxWorks 415
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
string to binary conversion in the db Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: string to binary conversion in the db Tim Mooney
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
| 
