Subject: |
Re: string to binary conversion in the db |
From: |
[email protected] (Tim Mooney) |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Feb 1995 15:18:08 -0600 |
re...
> Currently if CA sends a string to a binary database field we
> check in record support for an explicit match with the name of
> one of the states. If this fails shouldnt we also match for "0","1",
> ... matching a valid state so that it is easier to write (and
> use) ascii based tools?
Yes we should. It's hard to think of anything this change would
actually break, and it patches a hole lots of people would otherwise
have to work middling hard to avoid.
Tim
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Observations on EPICS Alpha port & DEC support of VxWorks Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: Observations on EPICS Alpha port & DEC support of VxWorks 415
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: string to binary conversion in the db William Lupton
- Next:
Re: string to binary conversion in the db John R. Winans
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|