Subject: |
Re: Making releases |
From: |
[email protected] (Alan K Biocca) |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Feb 95 16:33:45 PST |
I thing we've about exhausted the encryption technical issues.
For the record, I, like Tony, prefer the public-key system.
I put forth the private key system suggestion because it minimizes
effort somewhat. An engineering tradeoff.
Incidentally, another benefit of public-key is that for a beta, or patch,
or special of some kind the distribution can trivially be encrypted for
a subset of the recipients. Additionally all users can exchange email
or files encrypted as when sharing repaired source code,
etc. using the public keys they've each generated. And it is fun.
Pgp even has a mode allowing the encrypter of a message to force the
recipient to view it on the screen (and not easily save in a file) to
protect secret love letters from falling into the wrong hands..... :->)
Now you can have your affairs with military grade security.
Alan K Biocca
pgp public key available - finger [email protected]
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Making releases 415
- Next:
RE: Releases and Security Carl Dickey
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Making releases 415
- Next:
bug in recCompress.c F. Gougnaud
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|