Date: Tue, 12 Dec 1995 09:18:41 -0600
From: [email protected] (Marty Kraimer)
> Do we have to have more unbundling of extensions?
> The problem is that from the point of view of management the answer
> is yes but from the point of view of users more unbundling is a pain.
I think so. Perhaps you could have "ftp://" pointers all at APS
but some of them would point elsewhere, for example, to LANL for
OPI. Also, many of the APS extensions are quite APS-specific
and should be split off.
> What about things like GNU, CVS, and TCL/TK? Should these be made available
> via the APS site? Who will maintain these products? What is the complete list?
> Do any of them have platform dependent problems?
Again, it would convenient to have pointers in one place, and
you could have pointers to your local copies as well as to the
standard master sites. That way APS is not responsible for
having the very latest version. I would keep only the original
xxx.tar.Z.
I just found out for CVS you must include RCS and DIFF-UTILS.
For et_wish you need BLT and TCL-DP?
What else?
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: User authentication via web browsers Andrew Johnson
- Next:
Re: ATTN Platform Developers John R. Winans
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
ATTN Platform Developers Marty Kraimer
- Next:
Re: ATTN Platform Developers John R. Winans
- Index:
1994
<1995>
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|