Graham Waters wrote:
>
> I recently build the motor record and oms58 support for R3.13.xxx.
> I can only get it to initialize properly ( I think) by explicitly
> calling motor_init() (defined in drvOms58.c) after oms58Setup() in my
> startup script.
>
> If I don't do this it is never called and I get the following message:
>
> Illegal field value PV: "my record instance name" devOms58 (init_record)
> card does not exit!
>
> Am I must be missing an entry table somewhere?
>
> Graham.
Yes you are missing a definition
driver(drvOms)
Where you place this definition depends on how you set
up your Application Source/Release Environment. If
you are following the style used by makeBaseApp the
definition would go in the
xxxApp/src/xxxInclude.dbd
Marty Kraimer
P.S. defining the desired set of record,device,driver support
is perhaps the most frustrating part of 3.13 so have patience.
- Replies:
- Re: oms58 record support Graham Waters
- References:
- oms58 record support Graham Waters
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Early results of Using the Channel Access Nameserver at TJNAF David A . Bryan
- Next:
Re: oms58 record support Graham Waters
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
<1997>
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: oms58 record support Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: oms58 record support Graham Waters
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
<1997>
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|