EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: question about medm and the .PREC field
From: [email protected] (Tim Mooney)
To: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 18:47:02 -0600
re...

> 	I am using a special record developed at JLab to control LeCroy
> 1458 High Voltage mainframes and associated modules.  This record and its
> associated support works very well.  However, the record definition doesn't
> include a .PREC field.  This seems to produce the result, when I display
> the voltages and currents in a medm gui in "decimal" format, that I only
> see integer values.  Unfortunately, the first (and sometimes second)
> decimal place in the voltage and/or current contains information that I
> would like to see.  If I just add a .PREC field to this record and give it
> a value of 1 or 2, will medm "do the right thing" ?  Please note:  This
> special record does not make use of the .VAL field.  Instead, the values of
> interest are stored in other fields (essentially .VOLTAGE and .CURRENT)
> which I display in the medm gui.  So I am really asking if the .PREC field
> will influence the display of these other fields in the record.

Just adding a PREC field won't do anything at all because medm doesn't actually
look at that field.  Display precision is determined by what the record-support
function get_precision() says when it's called and asked (separately) about each
field medm wants to display.  PREC is just a convenient, standard way for the
database developer or user to give get_precision() a default answer.

Tim Mooney


Navigate by Date:
Prev: question about medm and the .PREC field Stephen Pate
Next: Re: question about medm and the .PREC field Stephen Pate
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: question about medm and the .PREC field Stephen Pate
Next: Re: question about medm and the .PREC field Stephen Pate
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·