EPICS Controls Argonne National Laboratory

Experimental Physics and
Industrial Control System

1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024  Index 1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
<== Date ==> <== Thread ==>

Subject: Re: question about medm and the .PREC field
From: Stephen Pate <[email protected]>
To: Tim Mooney <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 1998 18:17:20 -0700 (MST)
Dear Tim
	Thanks for your prompt answer -- I am a little confused, still...

On Mon, 14 Dec 1998, Tim Mooney wrote:

> 
> Just adding a PREC field won't do anything at all because medm doesn't
> actually look at that field.  Display precision is determined by what the
> record-support function get_precision() says when it's called and asked
> (separately) about each field medm wants to display.  PREC is just a
> convenient, standard way for the database developer or user to give
> get_precision() a default answer. 

Well, is medm (via channel access) calling get_precision() and thereby
indirectly looking at the .PREC field?  If not, why does the medm manual
explicitly mention the .PREC field as a source of information for the
display format?  It was the text in the medm manual which prompted my
question: 

"For all of the formats, the result depends on the number itself and the
precision as returned from channel access for the process variable. The
precision is typically the PREC field for the associated record." 

"Typically" is not typically a totally clear word to use, so I thought I
would poll the collected wisdom of the medm gurus about this issue.  

If adding the .PREC field is not the answer, what is?  Do I need both to
(1) add the .PREC field and also (2) change something in the record
support to make sure get_precision() is being called? 

						thanks again,
							Steve Pate
 
()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()()
Stephen Pate		Department of Physics		office:   505-646-2135
			Box 30001, Dept. 3D		dept:     505-646-3831
			New Mexico State University	fax:      505-646-1934
[email protected]		Las Cruces NM 88003		home:     505-382-6880






Navigate by Date:
Prev: Re: question about medm and the .PREC field Tim Mooney
Next: RE: question about medm and the .PREC field Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
Navigate by Thread:
Prev: Re: question about medm and the .PREC field Tim Mooney
Next: RE: question about medm and the .PREC field Jeff Hill
Index: 1994  1995  1996  1997  <19981999  2000  2001  2002  2003  2004  2005  2006  2007  2008  2009  2010  2011  2012  2013  2014  2015  2016  2017  2018  2019  2020  2021  2022  2023  2024 
ANJ, 10 Aug 2010 Valid HTML 4.01! · Home · News · About · Base · Modules · Extensions · Distributions · Download ·
· Search · EPICS V4 · IRMIS · Talk · Bugs · Documents · Links · Licensing ·