I work also on a server using cas and discovered the same problem - a
get from a cas based server will last extremly long. So I followed
jeff's suggestion to fix the times with the catime program. This is the
result:
Result of "catime" for the channels:
|"D_REC" - cas | "BIPOPSP1S4G:rdbk" -
IOC | Faktor:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Test |Elapsed Per Item Items per sec | Elapsed Per Item
Items per sec | IOC/cas
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
search |0,00123230 sec; 811,5; 0,1 Mbps | 0,00036710 sec;
2724,1; 0,5 Mbps | 3,36
pend event |0,00004800 sec; 20833,3; | 0,00004800 sec;
20833,3; | 1
float |
| |
async put |0,00012186 sec; 8206,1; 1,1 Mbps | 0,00007314 sec;
13672,4; 1,9 Mbps | 1,67
async get |0,00008211 sec; 12178,8; 1,7 Mbps | 0,00009105 sec;
10983,0; 1,5 Mbps | 0,9
synch get |0,10013000 sec; 10,0; 0,0 Mbps | 0,00135000
sec; 740,7; 0,1 Mbps | 74,07
string | ; ; |
; |
async put |0,00013968 sec; 7159,2; 1,2 Mbps | 0,00009733 sec;
10274,3; 1,7 Mbps | 1,44
async get |0,00008362 sec; 11958,9; 2,0 Mbps | 0,00013683 sec;
7308,3; 1,2 Mbps | 0,61
synch get |0,10012000 sec; 10,0; 0,0 Mbps | 0,00141000
sec; 709,2; 0,1 Mbps | 70,92
integer | ; ; |
; |
async put |0,00014669 sec; 6817,1; 0,9 Mbps | 0,00007738 sec;
12923,2; 1,8 Mbps | 1,9
async get |0,00007411 sec; 13493,5; 1,8 Mbps | 0,00009139 sec;
10942,1; 1,5 Mbps | 0,81
synch get |0,10012000 sec; 10,0; 0,0 Mbps | 0,00145000
sec; 689,7; 0,1 Mbps | 68,97
free |0,00007560 sec; 13227,5; 1,8 Mbps | 0,00009150 sec;
10929,0; 1,5 Mbps | 0,83
we see that all 'sync get' is 70 times more slow on the cas-server. Hy
jeff, what's that?
Bernhard Kuner
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Let's use the STL! [Was: about the abstractData.h] Bob Dalesio
- Next:
Re: Performance of portable CA server ? Bernhard Kuner
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
RE: Performance of portable CA server ? Jeff Hill
- Next:
Re: Performance of portable CA server ? Bernhard Kuner
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
<2000>
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|