> I never cared how many people use the same tool as I do as long
> as I get the work done. And of course this includes being able to
> efficiently and easily re-use (i.e. interface to) the things I have
> already done.
I will disagree that popularity of a particular tool _is_ by itself an
issue because we must maintain "programmer portability". That is,
we must be able to find programmers willing and able to move between
projects and code bases.
The availability of advanced productivity enhancing IDE's and other
debugging tools suitable for both traditional and embedded targets also
rapidly narrows our practical choices.
Jeff
- Replies:
- Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- References:
- Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: RAWF, RAWL Andrew Johnson
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Next:
Re: An additional remark on C++ Benjamin Franksen
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
<2001>
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|