I had thought that he was asking the more restricted question. I had not
considered the question of a record that was invoked (processes) as a result
of a forward link.
Fritz
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marty Kraimer [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 2:28 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Peregrine M. McGehee; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Record processing knowledge of dbAccess context
>
>
> I think he is asking a more generic question but maybe I am wrong.
>
> PUTF only determines is a record is being processed becaise a dbPutField
> was directed to the record which has PUTF true.
>
> If the dbPutField causes a set of records to be processed the other
> records will not have PUTF true.
>
> A record can be processed for many reasons:
>
> An input link in another record has PP true.
> Another record has a forward link to the record.
> An ouput link in another record has PP true.
> A dbPutField occurs in this record.
>
> PUTF was invented for reprocessing a record if a dbPutField is directed
> to a record while it is active so that it can be reprocessed when the
> record completes processing.
>
> Marty
>
> J. Frederick Bartlett wrote:
>
> >Marty,
> >
> > I am somewhat confused by your answer to Peregrine. I had
> thought the PUTF
> >field of a record, which is described in the "Record Reference Manual" as
> >"Did dbPutField cause the current record processing", is exactly what
> >Peregrine is looking for.
> >
> >
> Fritz
> >
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Marty Kraimer [mailto:[email protected]]
> >>Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2004 1:07 PM
> >>To: Peregrine M. McGehee
> >>Cc: [email protected]
> >>Subject: Re: Record processing knowledge of dbAccess context
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>Peregrine M. McGehee wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>Dear all,
> >>>
> >>>Is there any mechanism by which a record can determine the
> >>>reason for it being processed, i.e. can it distinguish between
> >>>a dbGet and dbPut to the same field?
> >>>
> >>>A look into the code suggests the answer is "No", but I'd
> >>>thought I'd ask.
> >>>
> >>>Best regards,
> >>> Peregrine
> >>>
> >>>
> >>No.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
- References:
- Re: Record processing knowledge of dbAccess context Marty Kraimer
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Record processing knowledge of dbAccess context Peregrine M. McGehee
- Next:
Problem starting StripTool JaSeong Ju
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
<2004>
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Record processing knowledge of dbAccess context Marty Kraimer
- Next:
RE: Record processing knowledge of dbAccess context Thompson, David H.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
<2004>
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|