Kate Feng wrote:
> Eric Norum wrote:
>
> > Kate Feng wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > 385c385
> > > < delay = 1;
> > > ---
> > >
> > >> delay = 0;
> >
> > I think that the existing behaviour matches the semantics described in the
> > application developer's guide.
>
> I guess I should have mentioned that it was a workaround, but
> not a fix. It turns out that it is not a good call.
>
> The IOC hung at iocInit() after we tried to add the eighth
> motor controller cards in the crate running RTEMS-mvme2307.
> Further tests showed that, as a wokaround,one clock tick of delay is
> needed between the end of the scaler_init_record()
> and before it entered the oms_init_record().
As I am sending this, I think it is possible that the motor cards was not
in a ready state for the oms_init_record()/motor_init_record_com().
Regards,
Kate
- References:
- Bugs in 3.14.5 Kate Feng
- Re: Bugs in 3.14.5 Eric Norum
- Re: Bugs in 3.14.5 Kate Feng
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: Bugs in 3.14.5 Kate Feng
- Next:
Question on transition modules Chestnut, Ronald P.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
<2004>
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: Bugs in 3.14.5 Kate Feng
- Next:
RE: Bugs in 3.14.5 Mark Rivers
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
<2004>
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|