On Tue, 2006-04-25 at 14:37 -0400, Kay-Uwe Kasemir wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2006, at 13:49 , Kay-Uwe Kasemir wrote:
> > So could the IOC use NFS to resolve those host names,
> > and what I see is a result of CA security waiting for NFS?
> ... which is of course nonsense.
>
> I meant name lookup (DNS, ...), since the basic change
> in our access security files since the last run was
> the addition of new host names.
We have removed DNS from our vxWorks kernel, so Jeff must be using
something like, gethostbyname. For example, what does casr use in its
report?
> And there are CA clients (CAJ and non-CAJ) running on new
> hosts, so in case the IOC tries to resolve host names,
> it'll now have more names to resolve.
>
> -Kay
>
- References:
- RE: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Jeff Hill
- Re: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Re: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Navigate by Date:
- Prev:
Re: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Next:
RE: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Thompson, David H.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
- Navigate by Thread:
- Prev:
Re: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Kay-Uwe Kasemir
- Next:
RE: No more CA connections? R3.14.7, 3.14.8.2, CAJ Thompson, David H.
- Index:
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
<2006>
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
|